Posted by: itstiffanyanne | July 6, 2008

Dot com love and loving the dot com.

Since the age of fourteen, I have been an avid user of the Internet. Back then my activity was mildly moderated, time limited, and server was the laughable AOL. By fifteen, as my parents separated, I began doing more surfing and was without limitations. Every social networking site advertised, I became a part of. My favorite Internet hangout in those days was a chatroom for my area. Everyone who was anyone had a link to it in their AIM profile.

My first real boyfriend at sixteen I met through someone that on the Internet and almost every subsequent relationship to this day has derived from some social networking website. I’ve met people from chatrooms, MySpace, True, OkCupid, and even the terribly put together eSpinTheBottle. Being more into women, I find the Internet the best way to meet because your sexuality is usually out on display, not to mention that I feel more comfortable initiating conversations with those I do not know. Right now, I am a big fan of OkCupid. Their questions are fantastic, thought-provoking, and fun. The matches, surprisingly enough, are actually quite accurate. I’ve met a few people from there and each was definitely high-quality and worth it.

The point of my blog is that so many people seem to down Internet dating but it seems to have worked in the favor of me and others I know, quite well. I’ve only ever, in my years of meeting people from the Internet, had one small problem and it’s been well worth it other than that. Since I currently am unemployed, I am also making a little bit of side cash with a project via a site that I found online.

For those of us who may be a little shy with meeting people in person, I believe that the Internet is a very helpful tool. I wouldn’t suggest it to anyone under eighteen like I was, but as adults, I would hope that we are responsible enough to know what safety precautions to take when doing so. I always require pictures and often talk to the person for a while via IM or telephone (though I have been known to skirt those rules, so unintelligently). Once again, the media has shed light over the negative situations to have occurred and I wanted to bring attention to the positive experiences that I have had.

Posted by: itstiffanyanne | July 1, 2008

Bisexuals on Parade.

As many have probably noticed, there has been an increase in the number of bisexual females in the past several years. Now let me forget for a moment the unbelievably ridiculous double standard that comes along with bisexuality as I recall the countless amount of times I’ve heard said quite ignorantly “if a chick does a chick she’s bi but if a guy does a chick, no turnin’ back man, he’s a homo”. No, I’m setting that annoyance aside to rant about something that’s become much more personal over the past few years.

Some people don’t believe in bisexuality, that it’s just greed or a grace period in which you make up your mind. I’m not quite sure what I believe, after all, most people eventually choose a side when they get married. Even that now has become a gray area as many of these “bisexual” women have chosen to have an open marriage so that they can have their cake and eat out too. What I am sure not to believe, is that the number of genuine bisexuals is really this high. About 70% of the girls and women that I have met in the past four years have identified as bisexual and I believe that only about 18% of those females were bisexual.

The dictionary defines a bisexual as “attracted to both sexes: sexually attracted to both men and women, or engaging in both heterosexual and homosexual activity” but that is just too broad. As Alfred Kinsey had studied, most women are attracted to other women so no one is truly “straight” or “gay”. Why do the labels matter? Society often feels comfortable with labels even if they complain about them, they seem lost without them but take my honest personal need for them: I need to know who my options are. The last comments I’m wanting to read are how we don’t need labels. Okay, rebel, anarchist, you’re unique and want to be better than labels. We’re accustomed to them now, might as well label them properly. The label debate is a whole separate blog (that I doubt I would even bother writing because I feel a strong sense of apathy, is that not an oxymoron? HAHA.)

“Engaging in sex with both genders” is definitely more bisexual but I feel like even that definition needs amending because if “the majority of society isn’t straight”, the “requirements” should be different. I hate to use the word requirements as if I find myself more deserving of the title, it isn’t the case, I just feel like it’s becoming too broad of a category and confusing me.

Let me put it this way, I’ve met four different kinds of “bisexuals” in my life. We have “the fake bisexual” who claims bisexuality for the attention of the men. Most men find the idea of two women together very sexy, so naturally, it definitely gets their attention. I’d like to take a moment to attack that idea itself. The fantasy of two women together is absolutely very attractive but it tends to lose its appeal when the woman you love leaves you for the other woman.

Another one, that goes more by the official definition but I still don’t recognize it as such, is “the uber-sexual” who just loves sex. The uber-sexual (yes I made it up but these are just my titles for the types of girls I’ve run into) just enjoys sexual experience, finds women sexually attractive like most straight women but acts on it. I’ve noticed that these women often too enjoy the attention of men. Most of the uber-sexuals I know will engage in many threesomes. I see many ads on dating sites where the uber-sexuals are seeking out a “sidepiece” to sleep with when they aren’t with their boyfriend/husband.

Most of us probably fall into the category of “the confused” which are those of us who just aren’t sure if we do lean a significant amount into one direction or really do have the feelings for both genders. I know I certainly do, four year struggle.

One that really drives me crazy are “the for nows” who are bisexual for now but know that they could never marry a woman. Why bother?

My definition of a bisexual would be someone that is currently attracted to both sexes, both physically and emotionally, and doesn’t have pre-disposed end to the lifestyle in sight. The dictionary’s definition of bisexual puts each branch into this category so I suppose for now, all of us share the name but I feel that we are so different and I do wish there was a name to be able to differentiate. This was definitely a rant and I’m sure plenty of people don’t agree with me but if you were me, I think you might understand. *Wink*

Posted by: itstiffanyanne | June 23, 2008

Co-sleeping is murder?

Recently, a friend of mine posted something saying not to let your infant sleep in your bed because you could be charged with murder if he or she passes away. For the first few months of my daughter’s life, we did co-sleeping. I awoke each time she made a peep and was always conscious of her presence in my bed. A personal opinion of mine is that co-sleeping can be hazardous to those who are very heavy sleepers and who toss and turn often. I am a single mother so obviously, I didn’t have to worry about anyone else’s sleeping habits. So many deaths in the media make it sound like you are a bad parent if you practice co-sleeping and that’s just ridiculous. Plenty of the mothers that I know have happy, healthy babies after or while still co-sleeping. Thank for the reputation, media.

Posted by: itstiffanyanne | June 20, 2008

Still alive!

I’m still around, sorry everyone. I have so many ideas but for some reason I never remember to come back on here or need to be in a particular mood to rant and rave about things. I promise to come back on and write soon.

Posted by: itstiffanyanne | May 20, 2008

Pitbuls aren’t NBK.

Pitbul, natural born killer? Wrong! Pitbuls have a bad reputation because of how common it has been to breed them as fighters or to harm people. I would say that pitbuls are definitely naturally a little hyper which makes it easy to use it for bad, I suppose but in the past three years I have met so many nice pitbuls. We have two quite pleasant pitbul mixes in my house, which they share with my infant daughter. They do not harm her, occasionally lick her but mostly just ignore her completely.

When I posted this picture on a message board, I got responses like “OMG WHY WOULD YOU PUT YOUR DAUGHTER NEXT TO THAT PITBUL?!” I couldn’t believe it. There are entire counties where just owning a pitbul is illegal and it’s all because of this ridiculous reputation. A pitbul on our street attacked a harmless dog late at night a few weeks ago and the police, knowing we owned pitbuls, came straight to our house to check our dogs out. I hate that people have ruined such a cute and fun breed of dog and now, so many are frightened, skeptical, and judgmental of the pups I so love so dearly.

Posted by: itstiffanyanne | May 8, 2008

Mindless Self Indulgence: What has publicity done?

Mindless Self Indulgence is a very unique band whom I’m hoping you have never heard of. Their music is full of energy and is somewhat of an acquired taste. The lyrics are very odd, controversial, and “funny” and the guitarist is very good. They were introduced to me by a classmate in high school five years ago. When I first started listening to them, no one really knew who they were. The last time I went to a concert, it only cost $20 at a local venue and lead singer, Jimmy Urine just hopped off of the stage at the end and gave autographs. Recently, I found out that Lyn-Z of MSI married Gerard Way of My Chemical Romance and that the association is causing a rise in popularity for my favorite band. Reading commentary by listeners on YouTube, it seems as though people think that MCR created MSI and that’s just ridiculous. Mindless Self Indulgence may not be considered good by mainstream terms but they have been good for years and seemed thrilled with being underground. Projekt Revolution apparently had Mindless Self Indulgence as openers and that bothered me because I really don’t want them to become mainstream popular, I’m pretty happy with the way it is now. Why did I make a post about such a thing? It is, for some reason, a big deal to me. I enjoy being able to afford the shows and get a chance to talk to the band members one-on-one and when bands get big, they don’t get close to the fans and it seems to all become about the money. I think I now understand what it means to be a “sellout”. People tell me that MSI make fun of all of it and don’t want to get big and I hope that’s true. I love when the music and the band can get personal. Mindless Self Indulgence is the best crazy shit you will ever hear.

Posted by: itstiffanyanne | May 5, 2008

Gay Pride: Corrupting Children?

Rainbows everywhere, people kissing and laughing, music playing, love and friendliness ringing through the town…how could this corrupt a child? Yesterday, I took my daughter to a Gay Pride festival and when I got home, my mother told me, “If you keep taking her to those things, you’re going to confuse her. She’s going to think that’s how it’s supposed to be.” Does taking a child to see Sigfried and Roy often cause them to approach a tiger at the zoo and teach it tricks? Some people, obviously, do not see homosexuality as part of everyday life but I see nothing wrong with exposing my daughter to all types of love, even if society deems it abnormal. I saw someone at this festival, among the protestors, with his child. That man is teaching his child to hate what he believes is wrong and that kind of behavior is the one which should not be passed on!

More than likely, I will marry a woman. This means that my daughter will see two women together more often than she will see a woman and a man, the traditional family, but I do believe she should be taught the norms so I will have a male role model for her and she will know that most people do not live like her mommy does. I don’t believe that having my daughter around things that are different will confuse her if I explain them and they will not damage her because though children are impressionable, in the end they make their own decisions as to what they believe and what they do. I don’t think that I am saying anything you don’t already know but it seems that some people try to mutilate fact with opinion and it drives me crazy. Even if homosexuality is some kind of disease, we know it isn’t contagious so exposing a child to is not going to ruin them.

Posted by: itstiffanyanne | April 23, 2008

Storm of brains.

itstiffanyanne.com is brand new and I am still in the brainstorming phase. There are plenty of large, general articles of fact combined with opinion that I plan on including but those would not be good things to open with.

I plan on including a gallery of my works on GIMP as well, they are certainly not perfect but that too is in its beginner stage, as well as a link to request something for yourself. Since I’m on the subject, I would like to mention that GIMP is an amazing program that is quite similar to Paint Shop Pro and just as complicated to figure out but it is free. GIMP can be downloaded here: http://www.gimp.org/downloads/ I was basically taught how to use the program by a series of tutorials made on a message board I used to visit and if you are as lost as I was, feel free to ask for the link to them.

Friends of mine have suggested to include a life blog but I have not yet determined how personal I should get because I feel that being at a dotcom now, I am much more public than I used to be. Also, I feel like half of the world doesn’t really care to hear how my life is going not to mention how uneventful it is! I’m no Gary Butterworth, after all. I am interested in hearing feedback as to what topics people would want to hear about, for instance, parenting or sexuality.

Posted by: itstiffanyanne | April 20, 2008

My own domain!

Categories